Remi Vanicat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Thaddeus H. Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:47:11PM +0100, Remi Vanicat wrote: >>> Well, i personally like very much to have all (well a lot of) my >>> documentation accessible, and searchable by dwww. For this I would want >>> the html to be already generated, and I'm probably not the only >>> one. Why not just create a -doc package that contain the tree of them, >>> or may be only pdf and html (but there will be people to disagree with >>> me on this). >> >> Hello Remi. Question please, for you and anyone else who cares to >> comment. I happen to maintain some documentation which has lots of >> mathematical formulas, geometrical diagrams, etc. I also happen to be >> upstream for this document. Docbook and other generic markups have >> always seemed to me a poor solution for the document, which currently is >> marked up only in LaTeX---but this also means that no general >> html/dhelp/dwww version of the document exists, and furthermore that the >> document's text is hard to grep. > > Note that you could try hevea/latexhtml to transform you documentation > to html. It might even lead to good result. Just try (it might not be > very good, but it might be good, hevea do a lot of good work for such > translating).
Or tex4ht. And there's also pdftohtml and pdftotext. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
