On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 09:37:38PM +0100, Remi Vanicat wrote: > "Thaddeus H. Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:47:11PM +0100, Remi Vanicat wrote: > >> Well, i personally like very much to have all (well a lot of) my > >> documentation accessible, and searchable by dwww. For this I would want > >> the html to be already generated, and I'm probably not the only > >> one. Why not just create a -doc package that contain the tree of them, > >> or may be only pdf and html (but there will be people to disagree with > >> me on this). > > > > Hello Remi. Question please, for you and anyone else who cares to > > comment. I happen to maintain some documentation which has lots of > > mathematical formulas, geometrical diagrams, etc. I also happen to be > > upstream for this document. Docbook and other generic markups have > > always seemed to me a poor solution for the document, which currently is > > marked up only in LaTeX---but this also means that no general > > html/dhelp/dwww version of the document exists, and furthermore that the > > document's text is hard to grep. > > Note that you could try hevea/latexhtml to transform you documentation > to html. It might even lead to good result. Just try (it might not be > very good, but it might be good, hevea do a lot of good work for such > translating).
In fact the recent version of HeVeA (1.08) largely improves over the previous versions when it comes to rendering of mathematical formulas, so I suggest you give it try. -Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
