On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:37:26AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> I realise that update-inetd needs to be more flexible than just servicing
> xinetd and netkit-inetd style configurations though...
What do you mean by "more flexible"? IMHO update-inetd should implement
just the minimum needed for package management purposes
(adding/removing/enabling/disabling a service).
Gabor
--
---------------------------------------------------------
MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
---------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
