Le dimanche 12 février 2006 à 09:22 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : > Am I in violation of the License merely by unpacking make or > by doing an "tla get" on my machine? If I am, why is this free -- I > can't even unpack the sources " with no Invariant Sections, with no > Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover Texts" on my SELinux > running Linux machine without breaking the law. > > If people who sponsored the second amendment can explain to me > why something that prevents me from using SELinux when all I am doing > is unpack and copy make sources is deemed free, I would be, err, > grateful.
Don't be so stubborn. This could be easily worked around by making GFDL works depend on a package containing a rootkit. This way, their installation would always comply with the license. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
