Brian M. Carlson wrote: > I would like to point out that if SPI (Debian's parent) doesn't have > rights to distribute (not just the individual DD), then this cannot > possibly be legally distributed by Debian.
It was intendet for a non-free package, not for main (the policy matches for non-free too, but exceptions can be made on a case-by-case basis). Additionally, the main purpose of the contract was, to just make sure that the respective DD does not upload embargoed packages before a given date. > Anyway, if that software is indeed in the archive, then it is in > violation of Policy 2.3, and should have a serious bug filed on it. It is not, because mako didn't answer on my mails. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
