On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:50:12PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Frank Küster wrote: > > Hi,
> > http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=tetex-base > > > > says that tetex-base is 0 days old. However, unstable has 3.0-13 which > > was uploaded on Jan 18th: > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2006/01/msg01818.html > > > > Is this just a bug in the qa scripts, or worse? > It's just a matter of britney not been running the last couple of days > AFAIK (though it has run today... so it will probably be shown as 1 days > old tomorrow?). It's been running, but not completing. Yesterday it completed when run by hand, but the results weren't committed because LCA interfered. Today it should complete on its own and be committed normally. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
