On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:07:29AM +0100, Xavier Roche wrote: > Hi folks,
> I have (in the httrack source package) a build-depends containing "zlib1g, > zlib1g-dev" - is there anything wrong with this dependency ? Yes, you should not be build-depending on zlib1g. > Some builders seems to have troubles: > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=httrack&ver=3.40.1-1&arch=ia64&stamp=1137978811&file=log&as=raw > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=httrack&ver=3.40.1-1&arch=hppa&stamp=1137979475&file=log&as=raw This isn't actually caused by the bug in your build-dependencies, though; it's some strange problem on the buildds themselves. I've asked the buildd maintainer about it already, but he's not been on IRC much over the weekend -- hopefully he'll be able to look at it tomorrow and figure out why the unstable buildds are asking for sarge versions of packages. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
