On 1/16/06, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > While I don't disagree with this sentiment, keep in mind that Debian > > itself is sometimes guilty of adding changes to packages when the > > upstream may or may not approve. Of course, we'll justify by saying > > that "users want it", or that it is in "the best interests of the > > users", but isn't that exactly the same excuse used by Ubuntu? > > That's right. > > The objection is not to changes in Ubuntu. The objection is to a > refusal to submit patches back.
What makes you think that there is general 'refusal to submit patches back'? Espc. these days, where there are wiki pages like this: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ContributingToDebian -- regards, Reinhard
