Hi Anthony, On Saturday, 14 Jan 2006, you wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:22:50PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > On Friday, 13 Jan 2006, you wrote: > > > Things I did today: > > > 2. Removed the empty SuperH architecture from the archive (binary-sh). > > > Coincidence? You decide. > > > URL: http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/2006/01/13#2006-01-13-sh-irts > > Nice you have done this, but Planet is definitely not the correct place > > to document changes like this. I would find it more appropriate to > > inform fellow DDs either via debian-devel@ or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not all > > developers read planet.debian.org. > > I think you'll find the correct place is the -sh list, which was notified: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-superh/2002/04/msg00010.html > > The "sh" arch in unstable has consisted of "Architecture: all" packages only > since then.
Even so you informed the porters it would have been nice to just drop a mail on -devel? Where is the problem in writing a mail to -devel? Going this way everybody would be informed and noone can complain afterwards. Greetings Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
