On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 03:24:42AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 06:04:00PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > The point of my previous mail was to demonstrate that I am, in fact, > > trying to be proactive about getting the qualification done. > > The way you demonstrate a commitment to getting archive qualification done > is filling out a page on the wiki like: > > http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/hurd-i386 > http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/kfreebsd-i386
Oh, hm. Must've missed that. And the stuff I wrote before was because I misparsed your mail into thinking you were talking about stuff like m68kEtchReleaseRecertification, which is something totally different. Sorry 'bout that; working on it now. [...] > The fact you don't have anyone able to make a working cross-compiler > speaks somewhat poorly of the support available for the m68k toolchain, > too. The issues with producing a working cross-compiler that I hit against were not m68k-specific. Also, they may or may not have been fixed in the mean time; I know for a fact that there is no updated toolchain-source package available, but there've been a few upstream updates in the mean time, and I didn't go out and check them anymore (since my previous attempts failed) -- .../ -/ ---/ .--./ / .--/ .-/ .../ -/ ../ -./ --./ / -.--/ ---/ ..-/ .-./ / -/ ../ --/ ./ / .--/ ../ -/ ..../ / -../ ./ -.-./ ---/ -../ ../ -./ --./ / --/ -.--/ / .../ ../ --./ -./ .-/ -/ ..-/ .-./ ./ .-.-.-/ / --/ ---/ .-./ .../ ./ / ../ .../ / ---/ ..-/ -/ -../ .-/ -/ ./ -../ / -/ ./ -.-./ ..../ -./ ---/ .-../ ---/ --./ -.--/ / .-/ -./ -.--/ .--/ .-/ -.--/ .-.-.-/ / ...-.-/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
