Steve Langasek wrote: > That's fine; I'm just saying that there's not much point in telling people > to *not* ship /var/run (or subdirectories thereof) in their package.
Well, there is the slight point that if you ship /var/run/foo in your package, you (a) probably use /var/run/foo just assuming it exists because, after all, you shipped in in your package; (b) if you actually mkdir -p it, you have two different ways that /var/run/foo could be created, and possibly with two different sets of permissions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
