Maurits van Rees wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 08:21:14AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > BTW, has anyone thought about what will happen when we have a stable > > release that has the 200n key in it and 200n+1 rolls around[1]? > > On January 1 (or whenever a new key is issued) do a security update > for stable on the package that has the keyring.
That doesn't address most of the issues I raised. Just for example, debootstrap in d-i would not see the new key. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
