On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:28:05AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > * Rename and rebuild the libraries listed below. The new suffix for > these packages should be in any case "c2a" (instead of "c2"). No > new suffix is needed when the soname changes in a new upstream > upload.
I noticed that atlas-cpp with renamed library packages has been
uploaded, and it renames the binary packages as follows:
libatlas-cpp-0.6-0 => libatlas-cpp-0.6-0c2
libatlas-cpp-0.6-0-dbg => libatlas-cpp-0.6-0c2-dbg
I have two questions for this:
1. Should -dbg packages be renamed or not?
2. Shouldn't the suffix be c2a in this case?
This also has the consequence of having different binary package names
than Ubuntu (Ubuntu only renamed libatlas-cpp-0.6-0 to
libatlas-cpp-0.6-0c2a, didn't rename -dbg package), Ubuntu MOTU cc:ed.
(Please cc: the reply to me, I'm not subscribed to debian-devel, thanks.)
Ming
2005.11.28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
