On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 02:36:06PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > FWIW, I don't see that there's a clear advantage to having the test harness > *expect* non-zero exit values (or non-empty output as you also suggested).
As I understood it, the proposed approach is about standardizing and easing the way we perform tests on debian packages. Since it often happen that both positive and negative tests are a need, having a way to describe externally (wrt the tests) their expected behaviour seem to me a good way to factorize in the tester the "expectation" code. It may also help in writing interfaces for showing tests results which will be more informative than a simple success/failure message. I agree though that my "very minimum" assertion was too strong. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
