On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 23:16:43 -0500, Noah Meyerhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Within the security team, there has recently been some talk of
> pushing for per-user temp directories by default in etch. I'd like
> to see what people's reaction to such a proposal would be.
> session optional pam_tmpdir.so
> I have little operational experience with this PAM module, though.
> Does it cause problems for certain apps? If so, could these
> problems be solved with a less simplistic PAM configuration?
It may need some tweaking of SELinux policy, depending on
where these per user temporary directories end up in.
manoj
--
An ounce of mother is worth a ton of priest. Spanish proverb
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
