On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 01:52:16PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > If that's the case, we should improve developer access instead of > backing your proposal.
which is exactly what i am trying to do, it just make smore sense to also make it more accessible to non-dds > Social networking systems exist outside of Debian that do a better job > at this. Supporting this is outside of our mandate, and not a good use > of our resources. You're as likely to want to get to know people who > aren't DD's as who are. How does your proposal address this problem? it doesn't > If you were talking about the average person on the street who thinks > nothing of sacrificing their privacy in the name of the "War on > Terror" (have a look at the polls some time, it's scary,) then yes, most > people don't have a problem with this. However, in Debian there is a > [...] there is a big difference between the right to stay anonymous and exercising this right. but this is getting offtopic... anyway, i did get your point: you would very much wish for that information to stay non-public unless one explicitely makes it public. which is (while i don't understand it) something i will accept. anyone else has any opinions on this matter? cu robert -- Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
