On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 11:14:53PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.24.2204 +0200]: > > So IMHO udev is more generic than hotplug. > > This is Unix, not monolithic-land. > > Also, udev was set out to do nothing other than device node > management.
Well, having both hotplug and udev means a lot of code duplication. That's not very Unix either... > > > The other comment is that udev is not generally accepted. A lot > > > of people still have reservations about it. > > > > I think the reason is that udev is still under rapid development > > and people are only starting to explore the flexibility it > > provides. > > Uh, that's one way of looking at it. The other might be sheer > insanity on the side of the developers. Well, since Greg K-H is upstream for both udev and hotplug, I'd say that's probably quite unlikely... [snip] Regards: David Weinehall -- /) David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /) Rime on my window (\ // ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ // Diamond-white roses of fire // \) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Beautiful hoar-frost (/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
