On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 10:41 +0200, Marc Chantreux wrote: > at least, i think zsh is better because it's almost 200k thinner: > > % ls -sh =zsh4 =bash > 616K /bin/bash 456K /bin/zsh4
I acutally use ksh for all my shell scripts (bash hasn't quite made it yet IMHO) and that beats both - 636K /bin/ksh But for my uses I care little for the odd kilobyte saved in a program thats being used in so many instances. I also use php for a lot of scripting using the command line php interpreter.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
