On 8/22/05, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Olaf! Hi, ;-> > > With a (far) better privilege system you could avoid running most if > > not all code as root, but that's another topic. > > No, you can't. The naming (whether you call it root or whatever) is > insignificant. You can't write down a set of rules that describe which > actions are deemed "good" and "bad", and since packages do need fairly
Why not? For example, I think most/some packages don't require the privilege to write to files owned by other packages. > many privileges to install and change files in a system, and execute > code (postinst, etc.), you can always screw up user's systems with a > malicious package. > > That's why we mainly trust developers, I agree. > not heuristics on the buildds.