On 8/22/05, Manoj Srivastava va, manoj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:37:10 +0200, W Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > Quoting Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> I used to think that too. I took a wander through queue/reject on > >> merkel. I don't think that any more. I'm curious as to how Ubuntu > >> is going to sustain source-only uploads, honestly. > > > Mandatory, signed build and test logs? I've no idea... > > UN-sustainable, in my opinion. The minute you add bits that > make maintainers prove they are doing something, you enter an > antagonistic relationship -- and my first inclination was to write up > a tool to forge such logs, and uipload that to Debian.
Indeed. Why would those checks be done client-side instead of server-side anyway?
