Scripsit Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 14-Aug-05, 11:09 (CDT), Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * License : Public domain with some files GPLv2+
> Doesn't that effectively reduce to "GPLv2+"?
For DFSG-freedom purposes, yes. Not for all other purposes (recipients
of the source package would have wider rights to reuse the "pulic domain"
files than to reuse the GPL-covered ones).
--
Henning Makholm "Anything you can discover we
would be most happy to review."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
