On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 02:40:32 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > In this context, woody->sarge transition packages are just one form of > useless cruft that we should strive to get rid of before the etch release.
I agree and I've been busy getting rid of that cruft. It's a pleasure to see how much the maintainer scripts can be simplified on the basis of the assumption that the previous version is sarge or later. -- Thomas Hood -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
