On 7/8/05, Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sure, old bugs may be the symptom that the maintainer is MIA, that the > upstream maintainer is MIA, and similar things that we should of > course track as well, but it does not mean that an old bug is "worse" > in any way than a new bug (eveything else being the same).
What's the proper way to deal with maintainers that kinda 'ignore' bugs (in whatever way)?
