Hi members of Debian at large, With the recent article from Zdnet, does Debian need a press officer or www.debian.org/press? If harm is done to the reputation to the Debian organization by word or deed, should there be someone to respond to this? Any legitimate news organization should do adequet fact checking and take a moment to ask some individual in Debian (or any org) for an offical comment. They found something 'newsworthy' and ran with it like a tabloid. I doubt they would do this with IBM! We are not second-class! Cheers, Kev -- counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted! `$' $' $ $ _ ,d$$$g$ ,d$$$b. $,d$$$b`$' g$$$$$b $,d$$b ,$P' `$ ,$P' `Y$ $$' `$ $ "' `$ $$' `$ $$ $ $$ggggg$ $ $ $ ,$P"" $ $ $ `$g. ,$$ `$$._ _. $ _,g$P $ `$b. ,$$ $ $ `Y$$P'$. `Y$$$$P $$$P"' ,$. `Y$$P'$ $. ,$.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature