On 6/26/05, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10332 March 1977, sean finney wrote: > > >> I'm sorry to say that Debian's hosting of machines at Above.Net has > >> come to an end. Michael Shields and Steve Osborn have hosted critical > > sorry to be a stick in the mud about this, but... > > why wasn't this brought up *before* it was brought to an end? > > It was sent right after the hosting died. > Should he sent "The hosting may die somewhere in the future, please > offer something just in case we need it"?
Shouldn't some redundancy (on all levels) be available for this kind of servers?
