On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 02:13:43PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > [Eric Cooper] > > Since there should be a unique replacement that old and new package > > maintainer(s) agree on, I think the old package (the one being > > replaced) should have the header. (Perhaps "Replaced-By:" ?) > > The whole point of the exercise was to get rid of dummy packages. > Your proposal requires one.
Unless there was a way to include these entries in the Packages file (or some other control file) other than dummy packages.. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
