Pierre Habouzit <madcoder <at> debian.org> writes: > > Le Jeu 16 Juin 2005 14:33, Santiago Vila a écrit : > > Now that we have released sarge, I would like to ask debian-admin and > > the Project Leader to consider seriously doing something to reduce > > the level of spam we have to receive, store, and filter in our > > <at> debian.org addresses. > > > > For example, we could use greylisting. Or we could reject messages > > that are known to come directly from trojanized windows machines > > acting as open proxies. Or even better, we could do both things. > > I fully disagree, greylisting is really painful, and I really hope this > would never be used as a default rule for email filtering. > > I'd prefer to see some tools like dspam/bogofilter/... used instead of > the heavy and not efficient enought SA. >
I've found that a combination of: * RBLs that dont suck - dsbl - sbl-xbl * URI-based filtering URIBL * dspam has worked *very* well for me. Even if you don't really want the spamhaus list, look into using the dsbl. It mostly consists of the worst configured hosts out there -- ones where someone was able to fool it to list itself on the list. I also echo that greylisting is a real pain. Thanks, -- Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
