Quoting martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Do libpam-umask ought to be "base" ? > > The discussion is here: http://bugs.debian.org/314539
And enforcing the use of libpam-umask is actually the direction we're taking.. First step probably : comment UMASK in login.defs in answer to #314539. Then probably discuss with the PAM maintainers and try having libpam-umask used by default (with sane defaults of course). Tollef is OK to improve it in areas it needs to be improved (user-level configuration and so on...).) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
