On Sunday 19 June 2005 08:24, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > An email address with such blocking on it is therefore not suitable > for the Maintainer: field of a Debian package.
What anti-spam measures do you consider acceptable for a Debian maintenance address? Keep in mind that most @debian.org email gets directed to another mail server that has some anti-spam measures in place. It seems to me that your personal requirements for lack of spam protection on Debian developers would exclude most DDs. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
