Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote on 16/06/2005 23:13: > On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 22:13 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > >>Perhaps this might be true for the initial Perl implementation, but: >> >>"[2001/03/03 10:05] Markus Schoder has contributed finddupes.cpp, GPL'ed >>source code for a C++ based version of my horribly slow compare routine. In >>his testing on a directory of 35,000 images, it was about 300 times faster >>than findimagedupes' perl implementation." > > Yup, but that's even more old, more than four years old. Will download > it and check if its still compilable even.
It's only compilable in its current state with g++-2.95 (regarding compilers in Debian stable). There is a single error when compiling with g++-3.4 which I am unable to fix (as I don't know the STL at all). Apart from that, it works quite fine. >>>and, I would say, both make it obsolete. >> >>If both would have a command line interface. > > I do not think they have. Exactly. >> I do not know both but >>the page you quoted mentioned that findimagedupes is the only command line >>tool. > > Yes, and this is sad. What I need is a command line tool as well. I can > not have any GUI where I would like to use it. Same for me. >>I would really love a command line alternative. If you tell me any >>I will be quiet immediately. > > I do not know any. But if any of you find an alternative, then please > tell me as well. /aol >> But I would love to have a test first. >>Please give me two weeks. > > Thanks, the time is on your side as I also would like to have a command > line based tool. Yes, pleeeeaaasse. cu, sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
