* Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Eric Dorland wrote: > > * Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > All of MoFo trademarks that were not being used in a manner > > > consistent with trademark law[2] would have to be expunged from > > > the work, > > > > What trademarks are you referring to? Already the Debian packages > > don't use any of the trademarked images and logos? > > If we don't use any trademarked images, logos, or phrases, what > exactly are we talking about here?
The term "Firefox" is what trademarked, and the only trademark still in the Debian package AFAIK. That's what we're talking about. > I'd hope there are more things at issue here than the name of the > script that eventually calls another script that eventually calls the > binary. [If that's all that we're discussing, I'd suggest just asking > a low priority debconf question about installing a > /usr/bin/mozilla-firefox symlink that links to the package in > question, and rename the binary package.] -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
