Le jeudi 09 juin 2005 à 02:13 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit : > For etch we will update the toolchain (glibc, binutils, > linux-kernel-headers, gcc) again. Some updates look easy, other will > have a bigger impact on packages. One aspect of the toolchain update > is the change of the C++ ABI from version 1 (102) to version 2 (1002) > of the GNU C++ compiler. Looks painful, but doable, as some of you > may still remember the toolchain update in the early sarge stages. In > short, we will have to rename all packages containing shared libraries > written in C++. After these library packages have been renamed, all > libraries and applications depending on the changed library names have > to be uploaded again. To minimize the uploads and and lower the load > of the buildds, C++ code should be uploaded, after the C++ compiler > (c++, g++) points to a compiler version providing the new C++ ABI.
I maintain a package (hdf5) which contains a pure C library and a C++ interface. However, I'm pretty sure the C++ library isn't used by packages depending on it. In this case, is it necessary for the library to be renamed? -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
