Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12-Jun-05, 02:27 (CDT), Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >From my reading of your package description for cogito, > > the name GIT (the version control system) doesn't seem to > > mean anything in particular. So renaming it would not be a big loss. > > The upstream name isn't going to change. There are probably already > more users of GIT-the-VCS than GIT-the-tools. So if you rename git for > Debian, we are very likely going to to be incompatible. > > Just Conflict with the git package. The overlapping user base is likely > to be nil.
There is at least one user that wants both... I got a bug report about this before I made cogito.deb Conflict with git.deb. (Then of course I was told that that was the wrong approach, so I _removed_ cogito's /usr/bin/git and removed the Conflict with git.deb.) But I agree totally with you. I'd much rather conflict with GNU Interactive Tools and have git-the-vcs be compatible with non-debian universe. That seems like the lesser of two evils. But everyone else on debian-devel seems to want it the other way so I gave in for now. -- Sebastian Kuzminsky -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]