* Sebastian Ley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050611 12:17]: > Am Samstag, 11. Juni 2005 07:43 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > > I'm also not really convinced that a 12-month release cycle is actually a > > good idea at this point -- in terms of either setting believable > > expectations, or what users of stable actually want (clearly anyone who > > stuck with woody for three years and is now upgrading to sarge doesn't see > > quick release cycles as a sticking point), or having a reasonable > > development cycle that lets us advance etch to where we want it to be after > > sarge having been largely frozen for the past year. > > I totally agree. Long release cycles with continued security support is a > major asset for many people using debian.
For that reason, I consider something like 18 months as target (that we also meet :) a good idea. However, we're getting too much in a discussion-style here, so I set F'up2 d-d. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
