On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 12:24:05PM +0100, Will Newton wrote: > On Friday 10 June 2005 05:59, Steve Langasek wrote: > > We're leaning towards possibly keeping udeb-generating packages frozen > > during etch still because they require manual intervention for syncing > > udebs into testing; this means separating the source packages that create > > udebs (which as a class were frozen later) from the rest of the base > > packages. > > I'm in the process of adopting a package (freetype2) that builds a udeb. > Would > updating this package now require manual intervention from the release team?
Yes, for the moment getting that into testing requires release-team approval (which is unlikely to be withheld - it's just so that the udeb can be synced at the same time). -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
