On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:15:39AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > David, this reminds me that the x.org packages probably need some big > push when it comes at their l10n for debconf stuff. > > Indeed, I intend to add the "whatever X thing etch will use by > default" packages to the "level 5" of D-I translations, meant to give > translators a kind of priority list for things to work on.
Awesome! That's great to hear. I think the xserver debconf stuff is one of the most-widely used set of templates around, so it'd be great to have it widely translated. > As this is very likely to be x.org things, we'd better prepare all this. > > So, when x.org packages will have reached the "ready to ship in > unstable" stage, could we manage to synchronise and post a call for > updates in debian-i18n ? Certaintly. You may have to ping me (either by mail or on irc) to remind me, but I'll add it to the TODO list. > Some write access to your repository for package maintenance would > probably also help (I will certainly delegate this to another -i18n > involved developer as I have enough of these on my shoulders) and > allow someone to avoid you or your co-maintainers the tedious task of > dealing with zillion of l10n bug reports. Branden runs the svn repo, so you'll have to ask him for access. > And, of course, some sync with the Ubuntu fellows is likely to avoid > double work here also..... That would definitely be nice. I consider the leaps we've made in translations with sarge to be one of the best improvements in Debian since woody, and I'd like to see more of it. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
