Your message dated Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:20:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#312282: release-notes: --guess?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2005 01:44:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 06 18:44:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from neskaya.eckenfels.net [81.169.181.10] (mailnull)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfT9D-0000ze-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 18:44:55 -0700
Received: from ecki by neskaya.eckenfels.net with local (Exim and XAMS )
id 1DfT98-000LAs-H7; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 03:44:50 +0200
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 03:44:50 +0200
From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-doc@lists.debian.org
Subject: release-notes: --guess?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on neskaya.eckenfels.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to
false
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: general
Version: debian-doc@lists.debian.org
Hello,
the german release notes talk about the "--guess" option to deborphan,
however this is only a prefix for multiple options, I guess this should mean
"--guess-dummy" or maybe "one of the --guess* options".
Sorry dont know which package to report this bug against, thats why i mail
directly. maybe it is a good idea to add "how to report a bug in this file",
too?
Eventually we may also want to add a paragraph about "how to find packages
on your system which are not (wih the corect version) in the official release"
Greetings
Bernd
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 312282-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2005 16:20:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 07 09:20:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp-out4.tiscali.nl [195.241.79.137]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dfgom-0005iI-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 09:20:45 -0700
Received: from [195.240.184.66] (helo=strider.fjphome.nl)
by smtp-out4.tiscali.nl with esmtp (Tiscali http://www.tiscali.nl)
id 1Dfgok-00007g-SX; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 18:20:43 +0200
From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: debian-doc@lists.debian.org
To: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#312282: release-notes: --guess?
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:20:34 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
Cc: debian-doc@lists.debian.org,
debian-l10n-german@lists.debian.org
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart1123822.qBpCBMOWh3";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--nextPart1123822.qBpCBMOWh3
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 03:44, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> the german release notes talk about the "--guess" option to deborphan,
> however this is only a prefix for multiple options, I guess this should
> mean "--guess-dummy" or maybe "one of the --guess* options".
The English version has "so you might also find deborphan with the --guess=
=20
options" which has been translated to "mit dem Parameter --guess", so I=20
guess this is primarily a translation problem. Therefore CCing the=20
l10n-german list.
I agree though that the original could be improved.
> Sorry dont know which package to report this bug against, thats why i
> mail directly. maybe it is a good idea to add "how to report a bug in
> this file", too?
There is no (pseudo-)package for the release notes currently. The d-doc=20
list is used to discuss issues in them. As reassigning is not really an=20
option, I'm closing this bug against general. Please follow up to d-doc.
> Eventually we may also want to add a paragraph about "how to find
> packages on your system which are not (wih the corect version) in the
> official release"
Hmm. Isn't that what "4.7 Obsolete packages" is all about?
Cheers,
=46JP
--nextPart1123822.qBpCBMOWh3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBCpclcgm/Kwh6ICoQRAvUqAJ4wCgJqICF40iRkgDWTTj3L3OSpswCeIpzz
0tmsEznTYGGxReN/G1QG+z0=
=xbyy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1123822.qBpCBMOWh3--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
