Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In any case, given the number of prospective ports waiting in the > wings, 11 is probably a roughly correct estimate even if we *do* drop > some architectures.
Speaking of prospective ports, what would be the feasibility of keeping testing frozen after sarge releases, do whatever toolchain updates are needed to support amd64 via t-p-u, and release etch as a "sarge+amd64" release in, say, 3 months? The rationale is that amd64 would be immediately useful whereas other architectures like s390x or whatever other port we plan to support can probably wait the 2+ years before the next release... (I don't know if it's possible to add an architecture without having all binaries go through unstable first so the idea is probably doomed, but it certainly appeals.) -- ,''`. : :' : Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> `. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/ `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
