In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > - We must improve and doesn't trash tests made in unstable:
Why do we need to do that? A package which is clearly improved or outdated does not need any testing. > - We must to use this same policy adding the normal unstable to testing > policy from testing to stable using a "stable waiting time" that could > be fixed to 30/60/90 days according to the priority (and eventually > section) of the packages. We dont change stable, this does not work you can only test the system as a whole. > So we cannot have entering two different packages in stable less than 30 > days sure we can. > So we will have a very slowly stable release moving without the needs of > formal freeze and releases: a "living" system. Kind of cancer? > Official cd are daily (or weekly) rebuilded snapshots of the stable > distro or net installable cd images. And you cant do QA nur security update, create additional mirror load on stable and kill cd distributors. I think you can do that for non-core packages like bsd packages, but the base system must be released as a whole. Greetings Bernd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
