On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 05:08:04PM +1000, Ben Burton wrote: > So I guess all I'm saying is that, if you're choosing whether or not > to attribute packages to the respective debian maintainers, there's no > obvious default that won't upset somebody (either through lack of > recognition, or through being blamed for problems that aren't their > fault).
Oh but there is, it just needs to depend on whether modification has occurred. So for unmodifed packages, Foo Bar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is the Debian maintainer of this package (which has been copied from Debian) and for others Silly Ubuntu Person In Question <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is the maintainer of this package (based on work from Debian) or the team that did it or whatever. -- Chris Boyle - http://cmb.is-a-geek.org/ GPG: B7D86E0F, MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ: 24151961, AIM: kerneloops, Yahoo: kerneloops, IRC: cmb on irc.uwcs.co.uk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
