On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:25:23AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > I'm throwing out a different idea,
> I propose that we split things along these lines: binary+source (B+S) > archs and source-only (SO) archs. > SO archs will be handled exactly like we do now, EXCEPT that we will > not distribute .debs for most packages. I expect that we will > distribute .debs for base and build-essential, mainly -- the minimum > someone needs to install a working system and build more packages. > * Difficulty of dealing with dependency loops > (possible solution: include one .deb from each loop in the dist) And for compilers written in their own language :-) -- Lionel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
