On Apr 02, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> I'm ok with (1), provided we do it in the non-free archive. > >> > This does present certain logistical problems for producing installers. > >> Which ones? > > The fact that they need these firmwares to work. > So what? So it is a problem, because currently it would not be allowed.
> Why would I (or anybody) object to that? The installer images in I don't know, but some people did. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
