On Mar 26, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You kept saying nothing more than "we don't care about modifying them > because nobody will ever want to", which is, well, simply false. Yet another strawman. What is false is your description of my arguments, which were much more complex than this.
> > at http://blog.bofh.it/id_33 . > Nothing there explains what the reduced level of freedom would be: > what freedoms do we still insist on, since they will not be the ones > we want for other programs? This was obvious from the context at the time I written that post, I consider acceptable for a temporary SC exception having only redistribution rights. > And nothing there explains why firmware should have less freedom, I see some arguments there, so maybe you should take more than 30 seconds to read the page. Or even better, look at the debian-devel and debian-legal archives where you can find more arguments from me and others. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
