On Mar 24, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That may be true for documentation but certainly not for firmware, which > has been discussed to death. (Not with a satisfactory outcome, imho.) And one of the reasons for which licensing for documentation has not been discussed is that most people were not aware of the scope of the "editorial" changes, so there was no reason to discuss anything.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
