On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 08:39:58PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote: > > No. There needs to be some override procedure like we have for maintainers > > not > > doing their job. But that's beyond the scope of this discussion. > > In this case, there is nothing to override, because the overrides are > actually changing something in the teams so that the team changes their mind > (that might actually mean there is nobody who opposed the change in the team > anymore, in a worst-case scenario). > > So, this should not be a point of contention in this sphere at all. It > belongs in some other level. Let's drop this point as a contention point, > then?
No, this is the main problem, that there is no counter power or limitation to what they can decide. We saw this already in the amd64 GR issue, and we can either accept their decission or have them resign in masse and be prepared to replace them. There is no accountability, and altough the DPL supposedly mandated them, he has no actual power to do anything about it. Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
