On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 09:07:52AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 02:57:23AM +0100, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote: > > > > * Three bodies (Security, System Administration, Release) are given > > > > independent veto power over the inclusion of an architecture. > > > > A) Does the entire team have to exercise this veto for it to be > > > > effective, or can one member of any team exercise this power > > > > effectively? > > > > > > It's expected that each team would exercise that veto as a *team*, by > > > reaching a consensus internally. > > > > This is obviously unacceptable. Why would a small number of people be > > allowed to veto inclusion of other people's work ? > > And a non-elected, non-properly-delegated, self-apointed group of people at > that.
Are you suggesting replacing the entire release and ftp-master teams? If so, please suggest who you would like in that role instead (or if we should all vote on it -- because hey, every position in Debian needs to be elected). Are you suggesting that everyone in Debian who has not been elected to their position should be elected so?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
