On Mar 19, Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's wrong with splitting into ftp-full-monty.d.o, carrying all archs, > including the popular ones, and ftp.d.o, carrying only the most popular > subset? This way, there's no need to mirror from both of them, and > duplication is kept to a minimum. Slightly increased traffic from the > fullblown server is the only drawback I see compared to the ports > proposal. That on some servers I'd like to mirror both archives, and I'd rather not waste a few GB on duplicated files.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
