Ben Collins wrote: >On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:44:49PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >> >I have an e3500 to replace both auric and vore (and the raid), but I >> >haven't gotten an ok from James to do so yet. >> >> That would cut the number of sparc buildds down to one, when two are >> required for RC archtectures under the new proposal. > >That's ok because two buildd's can run on the one machine. It has 6 cpu's.
That'll help to get things built, yes. :-) However, part of the point of the N+1 specification is for redundancy/resiliency... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [EMAIL PROTECTED] "I can't ever sleep on planes ... call it irrational if you like, but I'm afraid I'll miss my stop" -- Vivek Dasmohapatra -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
