On Mar 17, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > One of the conditions for SCC is "fully functioning Unix, including > > > DNS and firewall support." What specifically is intended by "firewall > > > support"? > > I think that simple ACLs are the bare minimum. > Ok, can you point me at the specific feature, and why is this feature I think that the minimum is per-interface permit/deny ACLs which could match at least on IP protocol number, TCP/UDP ports and ICMP types.
> important for packaging in SCC? Because Debian should not waste resources to support a toy OS (in this case defined as one not secure enough to stay on the internet for real work). -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
