On Wed, March 16, 2005 03:14, luna said: > Let us see what is exactly the proposal.
Right, this is exactly my view of the proposal: it isn't unreasonable for an arch to meet the requirements (except from the stated N<2/by-new ones which are controversial). With luna's clarifications I definately second the proposal. It really doesn't amount to "just dropping" 8 archs. It only sais that if your arch wants to stay in, it has to meet some minimal requirements. These are not unreasonable. Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
